<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Job Ads that will Get You the Talent You Want &#8211; the Devil&#8217;s in the Detail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.sixfigures.com.au/2009/10/22/job-ads-that-will-get-you-the-talent-you-want-the-devils-in-the-detail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.sixfigures.com.au/2009/10/22/job-ads-that-will-get-you-the-talent-you-want-the-devils-in-the-detail/</link>
	<description>Connecting Excellence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 01:34:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross Clennett</title>
		<link>http://blog.sixfigures.com.au/2009/10/22/job-ads-that-will-get-you-the-talent-you-want-the-devils-in-the-detail/#comment-1524</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ross Clennett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 01:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sixfigures.com.au/?p=1954#comment-1524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Totally agree. The more detailed and specific the ad, the more credible the ad and therefore the greater the chance of gaining a quality response. 

The more general and vague the ad, the more it sounds like a speculative attempt to gather resumes for sending &#039;on spec&#039; or floating to a client.

No matter how basic this advice appears to be, you only have to take a look at a random sample of job ads, no matter where they appear, to see how infrequently this principle is applied.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree. The more detailed and specific the ad, the more credible the ad and therefore the greater the chance of gaining a quality response. </p>
<p>The more general and vague the ad, the more it sounds like a speculative attempt to gather resumes for sending &#8216;on spec&#8217; or floating to a client.</p>
<p>No matter how basic this advice appears to be, you only have to take a look at a random sample of job ads, no matter where they appear, to see how infrequently this principle is applied.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

